- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
Ooooh...sorry, but disagree.
Suspending banking-borrowing would be a disaster. Your contract is a set number of points, but your trip isn't that same number of points and was never meant to be. You think members are complaining now? Just suspend banking-borrowing and yearn for the good ol' days!
Taking cash resort inventory out of the system to make DVC members whole on the other hand, THAT would work, and would not be as big of a deal as you might think. Reason being, I believe occupancy will be really low in the next year or so. Better to open this up to DVC members needing to use their points than to leave it empty. That goes for all resorts, not just Riviera.
It’s in the contract that They can suspend banking and borrowing and doing that will, in future UYs, limit the points to exactly what is inventory.
It is not up to DVC or a Disney to make members whole at the expense of Disney parks and resorts,
Again, I am basing my comments on what we, as owners, have rights to expect via our POS. It is all of it that TWDC is not responsible in any way for DVC issues,
That is not to say they can agree. The issue is that opening up and changing the rules, if this last longer is going to be a problem,
So, could they declare 100% of RIVera and absorb the costs once its declared..,possibly. Will they? Doubtful
Im not meant to sound harsh and I had a March trip, as well as a May trip with vulnerable points.
We are owners and therefore, like it our not, any and all choices ARE going to fall on the membership to take care of, IMO, no owner should be expecting Disney to bail us out,
I personally prefer that the decisions are based on long term solutions than short term for people who chose to travel late in their UY when we all know that is risky to do,
ETA: What this has done for me, is forced me to actually read our POS to have a much clearer understanding of our rights. My advice is that all owners do.
Last edited: