It's not a question of strict liability. Disney should be better than that.I just don’t understand why disney need to do more than what they did. They are not liable. Like we’ve said he could’ve got it anywhere and any others could’ve had it at WDW. Why do we need to know everything about this one person?
As for the rest, that's a meaningless excuse and ultimately self-defeating. We do not just throw our hands up and say oh well, you can catch it anywhere. Testing is still limited. Identifying lines of transmission is still vital. Anyone who was in proximity to this guy could benefit from this info. Health authorities could benefit from this info. This is more related to where he was staying and where the conference was, and this may or may not be at WDW.
In the broader picture like I said there are definitely people who could benefit from having the warnings and precautions driven home by organizations stepping up and sharing those warnings based on these facts.
Best response would be a public statement from Disney acknowledging at least one visitor to the parks (and hotel if applicable) has had this result, giving info and warning all past guests of the standard precautions and measures. I'm guessing something similar will be in their next announcement regarding operating dates.