All Aboard
Por favor mantengan se alejado de las puertas
- Joined
- Oct 21, 1999
I voted no (along with 87% of everyone.) My view has been well represented within this thread, so I won't rehash too much. One of the biggest differentiators for Disney has been the extended length attraction. The long, immersive experience that nobody else offered. It seems that thrill attractions, for the most part are over before they even started. Plus, I much prefer attractions that everyone in the family can enjoy together. And I think the vast majority of folks going to WDW feel this way.
Horizons was a 14 and a half minute attraction. World of Motion lasted 15 minutes and 15 seconds.
Test Track lasts 5 and half minutes, Rock n Roller is all of 3 minutes and 12 seconds long. I don't suspect Mission:Space will last any longer than these two.
I believe in the original goal of keeping Future World fresh, of replacing attractions every 10 to 15 years. However, I would have much rather seen the length of the attractions remain around 15 minutes. And have been of the story-telling nature of the originals.
Adding thrill attractions is fine. Eliminating great non-thrill attractions in order to do it, isn't.
Horizons was a 14 and a half minute attraction. World of Motion lasted 15 minutes and 15 seconds.
Test Track lasts 5 and half minutes, Rock n Roller is all of 3 minutes and 12 seconds long. I don't suspect Mission:Space will last any longer than these two.
I believe in the original goal of keeping Future World fresh, of replacing attractions every 10 to 15 years. However, I would have much rather seen the length of the attractions remain around 15 minutes. And have been of the story-telling nature of the originals.
Adding thrill attractions is fine. Eliminating great non-thrill attractions in order to do it, isn't.