Let me start by saying, as a U/M Alumnae, I support my school's effort to achieve diversity. I can think of no more noble cause. I was born to 2 lower income parents, who were (are) biggoted and were also on the "wrong" side of the color spectrum with regard to affirmative action. I can't remember how many times I heard "I didn't get the job because I'm the wrong color."
While at Michigan, I had the opportunity to be surrounded by people of ALL colors, ALL faiths, ALL ethnicities. It was wonderful and added an element to my education, that I never would have gotten otherwise. How could this be bad? This is IMHO, a worthy cause and the means justify the end. I think their method is creative and it appears to be working, where other programs have failed.
While I do feel for those "Better qualified" white students, who've been "passed over", (a phrase I heard quite often in my childhood), I would like to point out that there are other ways to accumulate the highly controversial "points", besides grades, test scores and race, as Dr. Coleman has pointed out. I HATE sports analogies, but here goes. Anyone remember the U/M, Notre Dame game this past season? The "Phantom Touchdown" and a questionable "Safety"? How do you coach to a team that lost that way? Simple. DON'T PLAY THAT CLOSE. If Michigan is your end all choice, then you had better start early, practice hard and find your way in. (I have a feeling, the studens who were "discriminated" against, could have their choice of many other top colleges or universities, so what is the issue here? Certainly not their ability to obtain a quality education, if indeed, they were so beautifully qualified.)
I would like some insight into how this issue has affected other Michigan Alumni, and/or current/prospective students. Since I really don't like the tone of the Debate Board (I really don't like confrontation, despite my topic), I'm posting here, hoping for some non-hostile dialoge. Anyone?
Tracy
While at Michigan, I had the opportunity to be surrounded by people of ALL colors, ALL faiths, ALL ethnicities. It was wonderful and added an element to my education, that I never would have gotten otherwise. How could this be bad? This is IMHO, a worthy cause and the means justify the end. I think their method is creative and it appears to be working, where other programs have failed.
While I do feel for those "Better qualified" white students, who've been "passed over", (a phrase I heard quite often in my childhood), I would like to point out that there are other ways to accumulate the highly controversial "points", besides grades, test scores and race, as Dr. Coleman has pointed out. I HATE sports analogies, but here goes. Anyone remember the U/M, Notre Dame game this past season? The "Phantom Touchdown" and a questionable "Safety"? How do you coach to a team that lost that way? Simple. DON'T PLAY THAT CLOSE. If Michigan is your end all choice, then you had better start early, practice hard and find your way in. (I have a feeling, the studens who were "discriminated" against, could have their choice of many other top colleges or universities, so what is the issue here? Certainly not their ability to obtain a quality education, if indeed, they were so beautifully qualified.)
I would like some insight into how this issue has affected other Michigan Alumni, and/or current/prospective students. Since I really don't like the tone of the Debate Board (I really don't like confrontation, despite my topic), I'm posting here, hoping for some non-hostile dialoge. Anyone?
Tracy