JeffJewell
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2000
...hey, if they'd built Test Track 30 years ago in Magic Kingdom instead of FutureWorld, a great many of my disappointments would evaporate. Conversely, if Space Mountain as we know it was currently being installed instead of Mission:Space, believe me, I'd wail about it.As for Space Mountain, my feelings about it are basically the same as Jeff's about Test Track. It's okay. Nice. Not bad. But (and I know this is heresy to some) for me its just basically a wild mouse in the dark with decent music.
Context, son. Ya keep, I say, ya keep nee-glecting the context.
I still believe your insistence to avoid the context of the decade in which rides were built (and the orders of magnitude of difference in Disney's available capital across those decades) weakens your "the new is as good as the old" argument to the point of irrelevancy.
Jeff
PS: this is where you let your "newbie" issue unfocus your argument. If you first saw Space Mountain in comparison to roller coasters of the early 1970's you'd see some serious Magic. If you first see it in comparison to late 1990's coasters, my response to your relative disappointment in that situation is "well, duh."