Skywise
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
This is good. I really prefer the Marvel method of creating a story through different characters and then have a central "Avengers" brand carrying the big plot points of the story.
That's what they want, and that's exactly what they had but they screwed the whole thing up.
I'm still flummoxed that they don't understand that Star Wars was, at its base, a SERIAL - you don't need a trilogy, you just need a MAIN storyline series that the other movies can branch off of (and Solo and Rogue One weren't those as they didn't tie together with the main movieline). Resistance is closer but doesn't really tie into the movies very well either (but then neither did Rebels or Clone Wars - though Clone Wars did alot to flesh out the various characters)
They're just trying to distance themselves from their disastrous missteps, which is fine, but I think this is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. More importantly I think this demonstrates that Disney doesn't really understand storycraft. (Marvel isn't really an exception here - Most of their movies tend to just work and ignore the overarching storylines which become mere macguffins to propel the characters. Back when the series started I thought we'd get some real details into the infinity stones - but that story mostly got told in end credits scenes and didn't really even factor into anything until the last movie when they rushed to get the last 3...) But then Lucas himself didn't even follow this as he destroyed the big reveal in Episode 5 (Darth Vader being Luke's father - hope that's not a spoiler!) in Episode 3 via retcon.