CNBC on Chapek & Iger’s falling out

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mayhem in the Magic Kingdom: Disney ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Walkout Underlines Bob Chapek’s Leadership Crisis
By Brent Lang, Cynthia Littleton

https://variety.com/2022/biz/feature...ay-1235212073/


Disney CEO Bob Chapek is facing a crisis of confidence in his leadership that is fueling an atypical level of turmoil at the top of the world’s largest entertainment company.

Though Chapek’s current employment contract, expiring next February, is expected to be renewed soon, according to sources, his tenure as CEO has been marked by upheaval since he was named to the job in February 2020. Some of the disruption has been far out of his control, such as a global pandemic. But Chapek’s own missteps reflect his tendency to keep counsel with a small group of senior executives rather than solicit wider opinions on key decisions.

“Chapek has had to deal with a series of catastrophes,” notes Peter Newman, the head of NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts’ MBA/MFA program, who observes that Chapek took over the company when COVID was upending the media and theme park businesses. “But many of his wounds have also been self-inflicted. A lot of top-level people in Hollywood know how to be smooth and handle things with finesse, and he has not shown that he has that ability.”

Chapek may not be in trouble with Disney’s board, but he’s in the doghouse with the company’s 200,000-plus employees around the world. Disney’s bungled response to Florida’s effort to pass the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which would severely restrict public school teachers’ ability to address LGBTQ-related subjects in the classroom, has sparked a revolt among many employees. The anger over the company’s failure to stand up to the latest politically motivated effort to demonize the LGBTQ community also brought to the surface resentment over the company’s lack of non-heterosexual-centered characters and storylines.

All of this was on display outside Disney studio gates in Burbank on March 22 when a small group of protesters gathered to coincide with the planned employee walkout here and in Florida. The sight of protesters outside Disney has only served to make Hollywood nostalgic for Chapek’s predecessor, Bob Iger, who has taken on the nickname “Saint Bob” in the nearly three months since he retired from his role as Disney executive chairman at the end of last year.

Chapek was already grappling with tough comparisons to Iger, who set the standard as an entertainment CEO for being polished in public, daring in business, artistically engaging with talent and a visionary on the future of media. Iger was also unafraid to take positions on social and political issues he believed in, whereas Chapek initially chose to stay mum on Florida’s Don’t Say Gay bill, which backfired badly inside Disney.

Chapek sought to quell the uprising over the Florida bill by apologizing (“I let you down,” he told employees on March 11) and announcing the company would pause donations to politicians in Florida.

This past weekend, CNBC published a detailed report on the turbulence inside the Magic Kingdom and the frayed relationship between Chapek and Iger, which only served to make many inside and outside Disney feel wistful for the way that Iger was always seen as the steady hand at the helm.

NYU’s Newman notes that under Chapek, Disney allowed a spat with Scarlett Johansson over the actor’s compensation for “Black Widow” to erupt into a lawsuit in a messy way that did little to endear him to Hollywood’s talent community.

Some of the issues, experts say, may have to do with the fact that Chapek came up through Disney’s home entertainment and consumer products divisions before transitioning to run the company’s theme parks. Those are major profit centers, but they are not the most public-facing parts of the company, nor are they creative-driven.

“Chapek rose up through the ranks as an operations guy and an outstanding one at that,” says Gene Del Vecchio, adjunct professor of marketing at the USC Marshall School of Business. “But when he’s had to put out fires as CEO, he’s stumbled on the political aspects of the job.”

For now, Disney insiders see no credible scenario where Chapek is ousted as CEO anytime soon. The complexity of running the entertainment giant would be daunting for any outsider, which is one of the reasons Chapek got the CEO nod after a yearslong bake-off with other top execs.

Moreover, Disney’s board of directors is full of fellow C-suite executives from public companies — such as General Motors CEO Mary Barra and Lululemon chief Calvin McDonald — who have weathered their own PR crises and scandals. Buoyed by the surprisingly strong earnings in the final quarter of 2021 (Disney’s fiscal Q1) that Disney delivered in February, Chapek’s stock remains high in the boardroom.

But the board also can’t ignore forever internal morale issues and concerns that Disney’s stature may have diminished in the creative community.

If Chapek is granted more time, he will need to start finding a part of the portfolio to reimagine in a way that cements his legacy. Michael Eisner, who ran Disney from 1984 to 2005, was credited with revitalizing its animation studio. Iger bet big on megabucks acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and 21st Century Fox that gave the company a formidable arsenal of intellectual property, and then pushed Disney to reorganize its entire media business to compete with Netflix as a streaming giant.

So how can Chapek make his presence felt?

“The question remains: Is Bob Chapek a visionary, who can articulate a path forward for Disney that is big and bold, or is he a caretaker, who manages what he inherits well but can’t determine what’s the next big thing?” says Del Vecchio. “That has yet to be determined.”
 
They shouldn't have ran Tom Staggs out of the company. Iger didn't want a successor until he wanted to get into politics. When he decided not to, it was too late and there wasn't anyone ready.
 
They shouldn't have ran Tom Staggs out of the company. Iger didn't want a successor until he wanted to get into politics. When he decided not to, it was too late and there wasn't anyone ready.
I wonder what Staggs is doing now and if he'd be interested in the job.
 
My 2 cents: Disney has seen the future and it is digital (and the high stock multiples that go with it). Chapek is doing exactly what he was tasked to do - maximize Parks revenue and profits in preparation of splitting the company in two (i.e. Disney Digital and Disney Parks). After that, it will seek a buyer for the Parks. Many will say that the Parks without Disney would not work. Wrong, Disney will continue to license the IP to the parks and a new owner would be most welcomed after Chapek. Disney would be relieved of the massive ongoing investment requirements of the theme parks while sitting back and collecting the licensing fees. Disney now becomes a pure digital play free to enjoy the stock multiples it envies.
 
My 2 cents: Disney has seen the future and it is digital (and the high stock multiples that go with it). Chapek is doing exactly what he was tasked to do - maximize Parks revenue and profits in preparation of splitting the company in two (i.e. Disney Digital and Disney Parks). After that, it will seek a buyer for the Parks. Many will say that the Parks without Disney would not work. Wrong, Disney will continue to license the IP to the parks and a new owner would be most welcomed after Chapek. Disney would be relieved of the massive ongoing investment requirements of the theme parks while sitting back and collecting the licensing fees. Disney now becomes a pure digital play free to enjoy the stock multiples it envies.
Fair.
 
After that, it will seek a buyer for the Parks. Many will say that the Parks without Disney would not work. Wrong, Disney will continue to license the IP to the parks and a new owner would be most welcomed after Chapek.

While I agree they’re going to do more digitally, they won’t sell the parks. They learned their lesson with Tokyo Disneyland and regret that decision. One of the most profitable theme parks in the world and it uses their IP, yet they don’t own it.

They also need the real estate as collateral. The Florida property alone is worth billions. It’s allowed them to secure multiple lines of credit. They couldn’t fund emerging technology without it.
 
My 2 cents: Disney has seen the future and it is digital (and the high stock multiples that go with it). Chapek is doing exactly what he was tasked to do - maximize Parks revenue and profits in preparation of splitting the company in two (i.e. Disney Digital and Disney Parks). After that, it will seek a buyer for the Parks. Many will say that the Parks without Disney would not work. Wrong, Disney will continue to license the IP to the parks and a new owner would be most welcomed after Chapek. Disney would be relieved of the massive ongoing investment requirements of the theme parks while sitting back and collecting the licensing fees. Disney now becomes a pure digital play free to enjoy the stock multiples it envies.
IMO, Disney's best park is not owned by Disney.
657517
 
Mayhem in the Magic Kingdom: Disney ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Walkout Underlines Bob Chapek’s Leadership Crisis
By Brent Lang, Cynthia Littleton

https://variety.com/2022/biz/feature...ay-1235212073/


Disney CEO Bob Chapek is facing a crisis of confidence in his leadership that is fueling an atypical level of turmoil at the top of the world’s largest entertainment company.

Though Chapek’s current employment contract, expiring next February, is expected to be renewed soon, according to sources, his tenure as CEO has been marked by upheaval since he was named to the job in February 2020. Some of the disruption has been far out of his control, such as a global pandemic. But Chapek’s own missteps reflect his tendency to keep counsel with a small group of senior executives rather than solicit wider opinions on key decisions.

“Chapek has had to deal with a series of catastrophes,” notes Peter Newman, the head of NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts’ MBA/MFA program, who observes that Chapek took over the company when COVID was upending the media and theme park businesses. “But many of his wounds have also been self-inflicted. A lot of top-level people in Hollywood know how to be smooth and handle things with finesse, and he has not shown that he has that ability.”

Chapek may not be in trouble with Disney’s board, but he’s in the doghouse with the company’s 200,000-plus employees around the world. Disney’s bungled response to Florida’s effort to pass the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which would severely restrict public school teachers’ ability to address LGBTQ-related subjects in the classroom, has sparked a revolt among many employees. The anger over the company’s failure to stand up to the latest politically motivated effort to demonize the LGBTQ community also brought to the surface resentment over the company’s lack of non-heterosexual-centered characters and storylines.

All of this was on display outside Disney studio gates in Burbank on March 22 when a small group of protesters gathered to coincide with the planned employee walkout here and in Florida. The sight of protesters outside Disney has only served to make Hollywood nostalgic for Chapek’s predecessor, Bob Iger, who has taken on the nickname “Saint Bob” in the nearly three months since he retired from his role as Disney executive chairman at the end of last year.

Chapek was already grappling with tough comparisons to Iger, who set the standard as an entertainment CEO for being polished in public, daring in business, artistically engaging with talent and a visionary on the future of media. Iger was also unafraid to take positions on social and political issues he believed in, whereas Chapek initially chose to stay mum on Florida’s Don’t Say Gay bill, which backfired badly inside Disney.

Chapek sought to quell the uprising over the Florida bill by apologizing (“I let you down,” he told employees on March 11) and announcing the company would pause donations to politicians in Florida.

This past weekend, CNBC published a detailed report on the turbulence inside the Magic Kingdom and the frayed relationship between Chapek and Iger, which only served to make many inside and outside Disney feel wistful for the way that Iger was always seen as the steady hand at the helm.

NYU’s Newman notes that under Chapek, Disney allowed a spat with Scarlett Johansson over the actor’s compensation for “Black Widow” to erupt into a lawsuit in a messy way that did little to endear him to Hollywood’s talent community.

Some of the issues, experts say, may have to do with the fact that Chapek came up through Disney’s home entertainment and consumer products divisions before transitioning to run the company’s theme parks. Those are major profit centers, but they are not the most public-facing parts of the company, nor are they creative-driven.

“Chapek rose up through the ranks as an operations guy and an outstanding one at that,” says Gene Del Vecchio, adjunct professor of marketing at the USC Marshall School of Business. “But when he’s had to put out fires as CEO, he’s stumbled on the political aspects of the job.”

For now, Disney insiders see no credible scenario where Chapek is ousted as CEO anytime soon. The complexity of running the entertainment giant would be daunting for any outsider, which is one of the reasons Chapek got the CEO nod after a yearslong bake-off with other top execs.

Moreover, Disney’s board of directors is full of fellow C-suite executives from public companies — such as General Motors CEO Mary Barra and Lululemon chief Calvin McDonald — who have weathered their own PR crises and scandals. Buoyed by the surprisingly strong earnings in the final quarter of 2021 (Disney’s fiscal Q1) that Disney delivered in February, Chapek’s stock remains high in the boardroom.

But the board also can’t ignore forever internal morale issues and concerns that Disney’s stature may have diminished in the creative community.

If Chapek is granted more time, he will need to start finding a part of the portfolio to reimagine in a way that cements his legacy. Michael Eisner, who ran Disney from 1984 to 2005, was credited with revitalizing its animation studio. Iger bet big on megabucks acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and 21st Century Fox that gave the company a formidable arsenal of intellectual property, and then pushed Disney to reorganize its entire media business to compete with Netflix as a streaming giant.

So how can Chapek make his presence felt?

“The question remains: Is Bob Chapek a visionary, who can articulate a path forward for Disney that is big and bold, or is he a caretaker, who manages what he inherits well but can’t determine what’s the next big thing?” says Del Vecchio. “That has yet to be determined.”
Very interesting post, but how does this look in light of the new petition by conservative employees saying they work in fear if they do not agree with the LBGTQ views. In re looking at this, would it have been best for Chapek to say nothing and completely stay out of the politics. He now has both LBGTQ and conservative employees disappointed in his leadership. I keep thinking of a scale of pro and cons on Chapek and it seems the negative bricks are outwaying the positive ones.
 
Very interesting post, but how does this look in light of the new petition by conservative employees saying they work in fear if they do not agree with the LBGTQ views. In re looking at this, would it have been best for Chapek to say nothing and completely stay out of the politics. He now has both LBGTQ and conservative employees disappointed in his leadership. I keep thinking of a scale of pro and cons on Chapek and it seems the negative bricks are outwaying the positive ones.

You are probably in the wrong company if you work at Disney and have LGBTQ concerns.
 
My 2 cents: Disney has seen the future and it is digital (and the high stock multiples that go with it). Chapek is doing exactly what he was tasked to do - maximize Parks revenue and profits in preparation of splitting the company in two (i.e. Disney Digital and Disney Parks). After that, it will seek a buyer for the Parks. Many will say that the Parks without Disney would not work. Wrong, Disney will continue to license the IP to the parks and a new owner would be most welcomed after Chapek. Disney would be relieved of the massive ongoing investment requirements of the theme parks while sitting back and collecting the licensing fees. Disney now becomes a pure digital play free to enjoy the stock multiples it envies.
Lol no.
 
I know this is going to be shocking to some people, but Disney has a lot more conservative employees than LGBT employees.
That may be so. But we will never know for sure because there are no statistics about it. Disney doesn't categorize their employees by sexual or political preference.
 
That may be so. But we will never know for sure because there are no statistics about it. Disney doesn't categorize their employees by sexual or political preference.
I don't think it would be wise for any employer to alienate either, particularly during a nationwide labor shortage, and Chapek has managed to alienate both.
 
A leader needs to lead in times of turmoil not sit there in silence hoping the problem goes away.
This. Leaving aside the politics, Disney bungled the PR aspect, and there’s been a series of PR blunders over the last year. Chapek strikes me as a compromiser who prefers to fly under the radar, and that’s not who you want as CEO. You want someone who visibly leads, who has presence, a salesperson-in-chief.

Genie+ is a case in point. It’s a compromise and if better planned and tested could have been something everyone dislikes but can live with. But bc of needless complexity and glitchiness, it’s become a rallying point for frustration. And Disney has said very little to address it, again showing poor PR.
 
Genie+ is a case in point. It’s a compromise and if better planned and tested could have been something everyone dislikes but can live with. But bc of needless complexity and glitchiness, it’s become a rallying point for frustration. And Disney has said very little to address it, again showing poor PR.


Worse they (he) want you to think there's nothing wrong when everyone knows there is.
 
Worse they (he) want you to think there's nothing wrong when everyone knows there is.
I wouldn't put it quite that bleakly. It's more act of omission than commission. Disney leadership seems a bit too content to ring the cash register and conclude everything's ok rather than addressing the concerns directly. They should tweak G+ to fix its worst glitches, explain it better, give context for why it's set up the way it is. They need to focus a bit more on PR and a bit less on short term $.
 
I wouldn't put it quite that bleakly. It's more act of omission than commission. Disney leadership seems a bit too content to ring the cash register and conclude everything's ok rather than addressing the concerns directly. They should tweak G+ to fix its worst glitches, explain it better, give context for why it's set up the way it is. They need to focus a bit more on PR and a bit less on short term $.
They should but they won't. It's the way Disney is now. It's a big reason that I am so down on them. Before Covid I did plan on taking my 2 year old to Disney but the changes to what was once the top Theme park company has made me change my mind. When YOU have to make the magic there is a problem.

I'm a Cedar Fair platinum pass holder and after seeing how they treated me in giving me this year free compares to how Disney treats it's AP holders. It's night and day. Don't get me started on Genie+. I have seen how a good skip the line system works and Genie+ is the worst of all of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top