I'm thinking to the POS. Once a unit is declared into the association it is there for use. The only reason I recall that it would be pulled out (other than maintenance) is due to damage or destruction. I do not recall anything else written as allowable but if you know of it Is l'd like to know where. When a resort is early in sales they have a clause that allows units still owned by DVD to be used in the mix but DVD doesn't own enough of AKV at this point to consider substitution in that way of all Jambo units and it's the only way I'm aware of other than damage.
It may be just for the initial period though so they figure they'll take some screaming for a few weeks and it's not enough time for it to go further in questioning.
I think the unique aspect of Jambo...which is not the same for CCV...is that it is in a building owned by Disney but also part of a larger AKV association that includes Kidani.
Since I don’t own AKV and don’t have access to how the documents read for those two resorts, it seems that Disney keeping the hotel portion closed, would be legal for the initial period because AKV Kidani is opening.
CL rooms can be taken out of service because of that being suspend...
But, as I posted in another thread, I don’t think what they are doing while AKL remains closed would apply if they open up their hotel rooms to other guests....no matter who those guests are..
Other than CL, once they decide to put anyone at AKL, then anyone with a current reservation should not be moved, unless, as you say there are maintenance issues,
CCV is different because it is it’s own association, so I think they were forced to open that, even though WL was closed.
Jambo, for me, is trickier because of it seeming as though it’s one resort,,,the fact that Jambo and Kidani owners have access to both at 11 months leads me to believe that opening Kidani only fulfills the legal aspect of the resort being opened.