Chills.....so glad they brought James Earl Jones back. No one can replace him in this.
Risk. Look at Nutcracker. It was an original take on the story and it’s bombing.Ok. On one hand we do enjoy the live action remakes, on the other hand a part of me thinks - why not put the money into a new story?
Technically it looks good, but the question is, other then live action, what new will it bring to the story?
Risk. Look at Nutcracker. It was an original take on the story and it’s bombing.
Nutcracker was original just using characters from an existing story. Either way risk is the issue.I mean like a completely new story, not redoing whatsw already been done.
Original was 1 hour 29 mins and this will be at least an hour longer. I could see them filling in the gaps in the time jump from the original. Expand on his relationship growing up with Tamon and Pumba.
Is this really "live action"? Looks to me like simply "next gen animation". I see the great technical work going on here (much like Jungle Book). But, at least Jungle Book had some real "live action". IIRC, only the kid was real there. I get "Beauty and the Beast". Really hard to draw the line between real and animation in it. But, it did have enough new material to make it interesting.live action remakes
It's photo-realistic and filmed on-location, which is different from the stylised animation used by WDAS and Pixar, so it's still live action to me.Is this really "live action"? Looks to me like simply "next gen animation". I see the great technical work going on here (much like Jungle Book). But, at least Jungle Book had some real "live action". IIRC, only the kid was real there. I get "Beauty and the Beast". Really hard to draw the line between real and animation in it. But, it did have enough new material to make it interesting.
What part of the "Lion King" trailer was "live action"?
Do you have any references on this? IMDB states the only filiming "location" is the studio itself...filmed on-location
It's photo-realistic and filmed on-location, which is different from the stylised animation used by WDAS and Pixar, so it's still live action to me.
I've enjoyed the few remakes I've gone to, but it seems like they are just pumping these out too quick and I haven't seen any since Beauty and the Beast. I highly doubt I'll see this in the theater. I'd rather see something new and original.
The first time I realized that the nutcracker was a new story was when @rteetz said it, I think I only saw the 30-second TV commercial trailer a couple times and never the full length one. I just watched the full trailer and it looks interesting. I had just kind of discounted it as the nutcracker that I've already seen many times. It is also up against some pretty stiff competition right now.
Oops, I was thinking of Jumanji, which isn't Disney, and the other Junglebook that went straight to streaming, also not Disney.BatB was the last live action remake they had. They did not release one in 2018.
Not a remake but Christopher Robin was a live action Winnie the Pooh story.BatB was the last live action remake they had. They did not release one in 2018.