I guess its ok for people to tell you if you disagree with government to leave the country because thats your stance, but its not ok for me to make a joke about people who oppose opposition to move to Cuba a communist country. This country was founded on opposition. How you read people that agree with scanners should move to Cuba into that I don't know.
I never told people who disagreed to leave the country. I have no idea where you came up with that one.
Maybe you have too many "opposes" in that once sentance. And I mixed up government with scanner. Sue me for mis-reading.
Again, no one has told you to not oppose what you believe in.
Of course they should. But, I was not aware that Bob Iger had a hand in writing legislation!
That letter (minus some of the more fringe issues that are dubious at best) would be better served sent to your legislative representative and senators.
Only if you know what a "bad guy" looks like.
And, don't rule out the notion that TSA is profiling anyway...I work with several people who are guilty of Flying While Middle Eastern. They are selected for "extra screening" at the checkpoint much more often than this ol' white boy from the Midwest.
My 4'9" MIL who is 86 has been pulled for extra screening since they started that bologna. She's a little Cajun lady who is the sweetest person in the world.
I have seen an old lady with a walker get pulled aside. Seems ridiculous. What was she going to do hijack the plane with her walker.
Not even debating the merits / risks / invasions / whatever of the screening, sending a letter to Disney about it is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen posted (or linked) here.
But maybe I should write Iger a letter about my taxes ....
Don't want to subject yourself, don't fly. As inconvenient as that may be, flying has never been and never will be a right. Just as it is a priveledge to drive and that you must submit to a breathalyzer (or suffer the consequences).
Last time I checked we still had our freedoms. I don't think we should blindly assume that we are safer because of the new scanners. Our forefathers fought for our freedoms, and we have the right to question the decision of using these new scanners. I am not convinced that they make us safer. We don't have to blindly follow because the TSA has decided to install these new scanners.
I don't believe that we are safer now than before 9/11. Will that get me to stop flying? No. I have found that those that question the TSA at the airport will be stopped, questioned, luggage torn apart while the next guy in line feels the same way and keeps his mouth shut and nothing happens to him. Great way to run a security checkpoint!
I am saying that we are a free people and have the right to question the new scanners. Some people don't have the option of not flying because their job requires it.
If you mean "not viable because I live too far from Disney", well, um no.really for a lot of the rest of us it isn't viable at all.
In which case you can request the hand screening, or you can get a new job. Last time I checked, a specific job wasn't a constitutionally guaranteed provision.Some people don't have the option of not flying because their job requires it.
Oh, I have too. But not nearly as often as my colleagues who happen to be (legal) immigrants from Iran, Saudi Arabia, or Egypt.My 4'9" MIL who is 86 has been pulled for extra screening since they started that bologna.
Please. They don't even rise to the level of "scrambled soft porn" from the old analog cable days.They might not be "exciting" to the average person, but they CERTAINLY are nude pictures.
Have you actually looked at the examples given on the TSA pages?
Examples which, of course, shouldn't exist, since they say they CANNOT send the images or keep the images AT ALL. ["The image cannot be stored, transmitted or printed, and is deleted immediately once viewed."] But that's beside the point.
They might not be "exciting" to the average person, but they CERTAINLY are nude pictures.
OK, so? Do people have the option of quitting their job? Yes. So the options still lie with the traveler. You may not like the options presented, but you still have options.I am saying that we are a free people and have the right to question the new scanners. Some people don't have the option of not flying because their job requires it.
Here are my thoughts
Will this make us any safe? Not likely
Do we have much choice? Not really
Will the US government/TSA screw this up? Most definitely
Will some files end up being saved and in the wrong hands? Definitely - the US government has a history of letting heavily secured, secret files into the wrong hands from Homeland Security, IRS, CIA, etc.
Will some bored, underpaid TSA agent eventually find a way to save imagies and post on Youtube? Quicker than you think and most liely not you, but some "celebrity"
Do I care if my naked scanned image does appear? Not even a little bit
Will the govenment eventually relase a contradictory study saying it could be unsafe? Most likely - this is the governemnt that told us cyclamates, red dye number 2, thalidomide, etc were all safe at one time.
Summary- Who cares? In the end we all die some time, stop sweating what you cannot control