Colleen27
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
I'm not a "certain tv network" and I don't know who you are referring to since every station here including local abc, nbc, cbs all say the same thing about San Francisco. You cannot deny it is filthy with urine/feces/needles, homeless camps on the streets, car widows bashed in . It use to be a nice get away for us for years for a day trip but refuse to go right now until it's cleaned up
I actually can deny that. I mentioned it upthread - we actually went into one of our trips *looking* for needles and feces since they're supposedly everywhere. We managed to find both in exactly one place, down a set of stairs to a half-basement entrance that was clearly being used by the homeless as shelter from the sun/wind/rain. Yes, there are homeless camps. There are homeless camps everywhere, especially in cities where the price of housing is so high relative to both wages for lower-skilled workers and social benefits that are supposed to help the non-working poor. There are homeless camped back in the woods in the state park near me, one that frequently makes lists of "best weekend getaways" in Detroit-area publications.
People are uncomfortable in places where the homeless problem is visible and I understand that, but the problem is everywhere and the state of SF is absolutely exaggerated by many in the media and otherwise. It isn't any worse than any number of other cities that don't get the same sort of attention (and, in our experiences, is better than some - the mentally ill/obviously high homeless were far more visible in Seattle, aggressive panhandling was far worse in DC and LA), and I do believe the reasons for that are ideological/political in nature. If it had been DC or LA or Seattle or Portland or Chicago or NYC or Detroit that produced two polarizing, high-profile national political figures, we'd be having this same conversation about homelessness, crime and filth in that city instead.