SplshMtn99
<font color=blue>She talks to me in pretty <font c
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2000
Tina, you have absolutely NO reason to apologize! I completely understand.
Its just that there are still Army members who look down at Guards members. Its experienced mostly on bases when guards are sent in to fill positions of deployed army. I wish it wasn't that way. But it is. They must think that they are all just weekend warriors & don't understand some of these guys hold full time & part time positions. If they give up their part time position....they lose their full time position. DH is running out of steam too & wishes he could give up ISISCS. But he says he "can't". I think its more like one of those "don't want to let anyone down" type of things.
Yes, you are correct on signal & learning new stuff & training others. That's alot of his travel. That & going to lots of technology conferences by vendors such as HP.
I look back & it all changed back when Clinton made all those troop cuts. Ever since then, they work so much harder / longer than they used to.
Its just that there are still Army members who look down at Guards members. Its experienced mostly on bases when guards are sent in to fill positions of deployed army. I wish it wasn't that way. But it is. They must think that they are all just weekend warriors & don't understand some of these guys hold full time & part time positions. If they give up their part time position....they lose their full time position. DH is running out of steam too & wishes he could give up ISISCS. But he says he "can't". I think its more like one of those "don't want to let anyone down" type of things.
Yes, you are correct on signal & learning new stuff & training others. That's alot of his travel. That & going to lots of technology conferences by vendors such as HP.
I look back & it all changed back when Clinton made all those troop cuts. Ever since then, they work so much harder / longer than they used to.