Now, all my reading up on taking the long runs slower and combined with wondering about how to minimize injury has brought me to wondering how a new approach will work. If I were to do all short runs at my recently achievable faster pace and then do all long runs at 15-16 minutes per mile, I'm coming to understand that on the day of the half itself, I could successfully run most if not all of the race at the faster pace even though none of my long runs will have been at this faster pace.
Am I wildly off base here? How much injury risk is inherent in this idea?
For point of reference, my current run walk ratio is roughly 13:30 for 1 1/2 minutes of running and roughly 15:45 for 2 1/2 minutes of walking.
If this works the way I hope it does, this will allow me to continue working on increasing my speed on the short runs without compromising my training on the long runs and reducing injury risk. Am I thinking the right way or am I missing something.
I think the first step is figuring out current fitness. Do you have any 5k or 10k races where the goal was to run for time? Since you have multiple HMs with character photos or really hot conditions, it makes it difficult to say exactly where you are physically.
The first clue I'd start with is the run/walk you're working with.
A 90/150 at 13:30/15:45 on the surface appears similar to a mile paced speed workout (45-90 seconds run with roughly double duration rest). But when I use that in a race equivalency calculator, that comes out to a 3:36 HM. So that's not a good assessment of fitness as a workout either. But what it does say to me is that you've chosen a pace that is 14:49 average. A Galloway LR is M Tempo + 2 minutes. So, this means the pace you are training at (14:49) would suggest a 12:49 marathon current fitness. That's a 2:40 HM and is very likely too fast, unless your current fitness justifies this pace.
So based on this, my first recommendation would be to actually attempt to assess your fitness. You could either do this with a Galloway Magic Mile. Warmup for ~2 miles with easy running (barely any effort). Then do a few acceleration gliders (where you pick up the pace gradually and then hold and then gradually slow down). These gliders should not be a sudden burst of sprint and you shouldn't be sprinting at the peak of it. They should only last a few seconds in total duration. After the WU and gliders, then attempt a mile at a relatively fast pace, but not an all out effort. This could serve as a measure for current fitness. Another option is signing up for a cheap local 5k and just seeing how that goes and go from there.
For the purpose of data, I'll give you an example of someone with HM current fitness of 2:59:59. Again, don't use these paces as you need to assess current fitness first. Train where you are, not where you want to be.
A 2:59:59 HM is a 13:44 min/mile average pace. The M Tempo is 14:18, which means the bulk of the Galloway LR pacing should be at 16:18 min/mile. This certainly creates a conundrum because your walking pace is a 15:45 min/mile. So you can actually walk faster than your scheduled average Galloway LR pace. Again, your current fitness may dictate differently. For the purpose of the example, I'll use a 17:00 min/mile walking pace.
The purpose of the LR is to be aerobic at it's core. Thus, I like to schedule aerobic pacing for the run portion. That means a pace between M Tempo (aerobic threshold) and LR. So in this example, I set the run pace at 15:20, walking pace at 17:00, and walking duration at 30 seconds (currently recommend walking duration by Galloway - my thoughts on why [
link]). So with those three variables set, the only remaining variable is running duration. For the average pace to be 16:18 (the desired Galloway + 2 min), then the run duration is 20 seconds. So, a 20/30 at 15:20/17:00 is one option for a long run for someone aiming for a 3:00 HM.
That easy/LR pacing should make up the bulk of your training (like 80%). The other time spent training can be sprinkled in with faster pacing. How much faster pacing is dependent on how much other running you do in total. But if you went with say a HM Tempo run or 10k run, you'd still do that in short durations not the whole entirety of a mid-week run. Like someone else's example:
0.5 mile @ Easy + 4 mile @ 120/30 sec @ 9:15/16:00 paces + 0.5 mile @ Easy
So start with a current fitness assessment and move from there.
So question: does anyone have a good, intermediate/advanced 5-10k plan to recommend? Not like I intend to try and PR, but I need something where I get a real workout.
@DopeyBadger could this be up your alley?
I can do 5k/10k workouts. I use the Daniels 5k/10k scheme and customize it to the user. The plan focuses on mile, 3k, and threshold pacing. The 3k paced runs per Daniels are "the most difficult endurance runner paced runs". They are very difficult from my own experience. As does any plan with very fast pacing it does come with a higher risk for injury. It's all about maintaining proper running form throughout and really really listening to your body. Here are two example testimonials from people who finished the plan:
Plan #122
Name: redacted
Race/Distance: 10K
Training Plan Duration (weeks): 14
Continuous or Run/Walk: Continuous
Days per Week: 5
# of Hard Days (per week): 3
Peak Week Duration: 6:27:46
Peak Week Mileage: 31.125
Peak Single Run Duration: 1:54:30
Peak Single Run Mileage: 12
PR at Distance Going into it (including when it occurred): 51:18
Expectations Going into it: There was a lot of "What have I gotten myself into?" early on in the training. I had just come off a marathon and told myself I was going to take a month or two off. I had also been dealing with some foot problems on and off for 18 months or so, which had limited me to three days a week of running. Speed training five days a week seemed a little risky and DB even mentioned the plan came with a high risk of injury. That said, I had read nothing but good things about DB's plans and I figured it couldn't hurt (much) to give it a try and pivot to a more traditional marathon training plan if things didn't work out. Ultimately, I was just trying to stay in shape during the winter months.
Testimonial: The numbers speak for themselves. The final day of my training was a 10K "race"/time trial. Not only did I PR the 10K at 46:01, I also set PRs for 1K, 1 mile, 2 miles and 5K. My first mile out was 6:45, most likely a lifetime PR! There is no other way to put it: DopeyBadger's plan made me stronger, faster and more fit. He also personally offered encouragement throughout the training period, which was always appreciated. At 34, I would have never guessed five days a week was possible. I would have never guessed those PRs were possible. If someone told me six months ago I'd do a sub-7 minute mile, I would have laughed. Now, I'm willing to rethink what is possible for me and my fitness goals.
Plan #71
Name: redacted
Race/Distance: 10 mile
Training Plan Duration (weeks): 15
Continuous or Run/Walk: Continuous
Days per Week: 5
# of Hard Days (per week): 3
Peak Week Duration: 6:04:38 *scheduled (actual was 6:23:45)
Peak Week Mileage: 37.125 (actual 37.9)
Peak Single Run Duration: 1:30:11
Peak Single Run Mileage: 10 (1M WU + 9M Tempo)
PR at Distance Going into it (including when it occurred): 1:33:32
Expectations Going into it: I was really worried how this would all work out. You warned me that there was risk of injury due to the nature of the training. That coupled with the fact that my “easy” runs were now 5.5 miles instead of 3 scared me a bit. I had followed Nike+ and Higdon plans before. Both of those included some speed work but not nearly as much and the overall mileage was a lot lower. Despite my nerves, you assured me we could adjust as needed so I committed.
Testimonial: I did a pretty good job at sticking to the plan early on. As summer heated up and my motivation waned, I missed a few runs but still completed more than I had for other recent training periods. Finding the pacing was difficult for me for the longer hard workouts. I mentioned it several times in my journal, but I believed at the time (and still do) that it was a mental focus issue more than a fitness issue. All that is to say, I had a few doubts in my head about how the race would go.
Going into the training, I had a goal of breaking 1:20 which would have improved my POT for Disney. You assessed my fitness to establish a goal 1:22:30. A few weeks before the race, my husband asked when my legs got so sexy (maybe that's TMI?). Anyway, I was pretty sure my goal wasn't attainable anymore so I had decided that at least I would get that small victory. In the end, I finished in 1:18:21 which is better than I could have imagined. On top of achieving the time goal and improving my POT (which turned out to be a moot point), this training cycle gave me a great base to work from for the WDW marathon.
Thank you for that! And thank you for all your encouragement and advice along the way! I know I could have done a better job with my marathon training, but your positive attitude and knowledge let me forget that on race day and trust the training I had done. Who knew someone could enjoy running for 26+ miles with only running up to 16 miles in training? I’m a believer and a testament to that ideology now.