I could maybe see it in cities/counties, because the political and social fallout of the economic consequences will primarily land elsewhere. I don't expect to see further state lockdowns because I don't expect to see further stimulus until early next year, if at all, and by then the worst of the winter surge will be baked in. If there wasn't enough political will to get it done before the election, there certainly won't be in a lame duck session when public opinion is irrelevant to a crucial number of the parties involved. And it is abundantly clear that there will be no federal action this year, at the very least.
I'm not advocating for herd immunity. I don't think it is a reasonable approach unless it is pursued cautiously and with a patience those advocating for it have not exhibited (tiered reopenings, universal and enforced mask mandates, circuit breakers built in to the plan based on hospitalizations, etc.), and even then it would be costly. But I don't think there is any other path available to us right now, between the lack of public cooperation and the lack of economic support. At some point, the virus is simply going to be too widespread for anything less than the sort of total and enforced lockdowns that we've never seen here, and for political/cultural reasons aren't likely to see, to have an impact. I'm also not particularly optimistic about public vaccination by summer; a handful of targeted, high-risk groups, sure, but not enough of the population to constrain spread through vaccination alone.